The Trump Administration and Animal Welfare: Broader Policies and Indirect Effects on Dog Owners

Information on federal policies specifically for dog owners has been limited. Most recent developments in animal-related policies have focused on broader issues.

The administration has been criticized by animal welfare organizations for a proposed rule that would narrow the definition of “harm” under the Endangered Species Act. This change could lead to fewer protections for habitats, which could indirectly affect domestic animals in areas where they share environments with wildlife.

On the other hand, there have been efforts to reduce animal testing in federal agencies like the FDA and NIH, with a new focus on alternative methods such as artificial intelligence models. While not directly for pet owners, these changes reflect a shift in approach to animal-related issues within the government.

Federal law, primarily the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), continues to set minimum standards for the humane treatment of animals, including dogs, that are bred for commercial sale. However, the enforcement of these standards by the USDA has been a subject of ongoing concern for animal welfare advocates. Most laws directly impacting dog owners, such as leash laws, licensing, and microchipping requirements, remain at the state and local level.